Archive for May, 2007

A Hate-Filled Man Dies

May 16, 2007

One doesn’t want to take cheap shots at someone who can’t defend himself. Being dead, Jerry Falwell can’t. But his work, unfortunately, will live on, so it’s fair game for criticism.

What exactly was Jerry Falwell’s work? Frightening people about the threat of rampaging sexuality in their communities. Making people feel guilty about the sexual impulses in their hearts. Lying—yes, lying—about what others said, did, felt, desired. A man of the world, conversant with kings and princes, Falwell knew better. But his power was exactly as large as the fear and anger of those he inspired, and so he did whatever he had to excite fear and anger.

He also founded and ran Liberty University, which has already placed over 100 graduates in the upper echelon of the Bush Administration. Many have already been implicated in scandal—almost always in situations involving the withholding or manipulating of information. Liberty University is not a “university” in the sense of a commitment to teaching people how to question and think. It awards degrees, but its mission is to evangelize the world—which is to say, to inspire more fear and anger about sexuality. So says its website.

With Congress recently debating a hate crimes bill, it’s unfortunate that Falwell’s programme was not and will not be identified as the institutionalization of hate. Calling ideas “religious,” saying that ideas are the instruction of “a loving God,” should not blind us to the hate at their core. Falwell instructed people to hate a part of themselves and a part of each other. Tens of millions of people obeyed him, and will continue to do so far beyond his death.

That’s Jerry Falwell’s legacy.


TechnoratiTechnorati: , , , , , , , , , ,

Ancient Greeks, Modern Romans

May 12, 2007

I’m in Rome, Italy—combination holiday and teaching for a week. No complaints here.

Inside the huge Coliseum there are large corridors (as in any big stadium), and this month they’re being used for an exhibit of Grecian pottery and statues—about the god Eros. I’m not generally a pottery or statue kind of guy, but while I was at the Coliseum I did take a look.

As cool as the ancient artifacts were, what blew me away was the exhibit’s narrative. The theme of the exhibit was understanding Eros as an expression of human emotion, power, drama, society. And so the writeup talked about how the ancient Greeks saw sexuality and sensuality in a comprehensive social and political way.

Some pottery featured couples of various ages. Seems that 2,000 years ago people hugged and kissed just like we do. Nice. The exhibit also showed depictions of threesomes and groups. The accompanying text was unblinking: many Greeks, especially the intelligentsia, artists, and upper classes, were non-monogamous, seeing sexuality as a valid activity that could lead to growth in addition to pleasure.

Then we saw art depicting sex between men and adolescent males. And the writeup let me know I was indeed outside the U.S.: it described how these sexual relationships were vehicles for mentoring, and preparation for adulthood and marriage. No mention of abuse, no disgust, no pretending it was something else.

I shivered.

I am NOT advocating such relationships in 21st-century America (and, of course, I must say so firmly, immediately). But it was moving to see an honest description of sexual expression as it was then. No condescension (moralizing that the Greeks didn’t know better), no warning (don’t try this at home), and even more moving—the exhibit wasn’t X-rated. Families strolled right by it, teens looked at it, couples discussed it.

In America, you could actually get arrested for owning these pieces—you know, “child porn.” If it scares someone it can’t be just art, right?

Sex. People have been doing it forever. Some people learn from it. Some people learn about it. Some people think we shouldn’t.


TechnoratiTechnorati: , , , , , , , , , ,